networking:wireless_topic:wi-fi_6:wi-fi_6
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
networking:wireless_topic:wi-fi_6:wi-fi_6 [2024/08/12 16:50] – aperez | networking:wireless_topic:wi-fi_6:wi-fi_6 [2025/03/09 16:32] (current) – aperez | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* **Minimum SNR and RSSI** Determines the minimum SNR and RSSI required for a specific MSC index. | * **Minimum SNR and RSSI** Determines the minimum SNR and RSSI required for a specific MSC index. | ||
* **OFDMA is essentially a type of OFDM for multiple users**. It allocates in both the time domain and the frequency domain, allowing for multiple users—even those with widely varying use patterns or data loads. By comparison, OFDM can allocate only sequentially. | * **OFDMA is essentially a type of OFDM for multiple users**. It allocates in both the time domain and the frequency domain, allowing for multiple users—even those with widely varying use patterns or data loads. By comparison, OFDM can allocate only sequentially. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * **802.11n**: | ||
+ | * **802.11ac**: | ||
+ | * **802.11ax**: | ||
+ | * **IEEE 802.11be (future standard)**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | In summary, **VHT** refers to the **Very High Throughput technology used in 802.11ac**, while **HE** refers to the **High Efficiency technology used in 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6)**. There is no direct correlation between **VHT** and the newly proposed **EHT technology for 802.11be**, **also known as Wi-Fi 7**. However, both **VHT** and **HE** **aim to improve Wi-Fi performance in terms of speed and efficiency compared to the previous standard, 802.11n.** | ||
+ | |||
Line 93: | Line 103: | ||
WPA3 and WPA2 support most new devices __but don’t support some old devices.__ | WPA3 and WPA2 support most new devices __but don’t support some old devices.__ | ||
It’s advised to choose WPA3 since it’s faster and safer than its predecessors, | It’s advised to choose WPA3 since it’s faster and safer than its predecessors, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 136: | Line 149: | ||
Note: The data rate is approximate, | Note: The data rate is approximate, | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
---- | ---- | ||
**[[https:// | **[[https:// | ||
Line 565: | Line 581: | ||
**[[https:// | **[[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Best practics IAP Aruba Networks ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Eliminate the viability of using 80Mhz channels in 2.4 Ghz.** | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | I reduced the power on 2.4 Ghz to a min: 6 and a maximum of 12 dBm (decibelios-miliwatt). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 23 dBm (200 mW) – High power, suitable for wide coverage. | ||
+ | * 17 dBm (50 mW) – Medium power, balanced for stability and coverage. | ||
+ | * 10 dBm (10 mW) – Low power, ideal for high-density AP environments. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I activate the smart antenna option. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Smart Antenna can**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Detect the best signal path to connected devices, improving coverage and signal quality. | ||
+ | * Reduce interference by dynamically adjusting the antenna pattern in response to changes in the wireless environment. | ||
+ | * Enhance spectral efficiency by directing the signal toward clients instead of broadcasting in all directions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Technologies involved**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Beamforming: | ||
+ | * ClientMatch: | ||
+ | * Antenna Steering: Switches between antenna patterns to optimize connectivity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Other changes: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Band Steering: Enabled (Encourages 5 GHz usage for better performance) | ||
+ | * Airtime Fairness: Enabled (Balances bandwidth among clients) | ||
+ | * ClientMatch: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Aruba Networks**, **SLB** (**Server Load Balancing**) mode helps optimize traffic distribution across multiple servers to enhance performance and redundancy. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | This you have three options: **Channel, Radio, Relationship + Channel.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | 🔹 **SLB Mode Options** | ||
+ | 1️⃣ **Channel Mode (Best for Simple Load Distribution)** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ✔ How it works: Traffic is distributed across available channels without considering the ratio. | ||
+ | ✔ Best for: Evenly spreading traffic across multiple links. | ||
+ | ✔ Use Case: General enterprise networks with equal-capacity links. | ||
+ | ✔ Pros: Simple to configure, ensures balanced traffic distribution. | ||
+ | ✔ Cons: Doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2️⃣**Ratio Mode (Best for Weighted Load Balancing)** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ✔ How it works: Assigns traffic based on predefined ratios (e.g., 70% to one channel, 30% to another). | ||
+ | ✔ Best for: Networks where different links have different capacities. | ||
+ | ✔ Use Case: Hybrid WAN environments, | ||
+ | ✔ Pros: Maximizes link efficiency by considering bandwidth differences. | ||
+ | ✔ Cons: Requires manual tuning to set the correct ratios. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 3️⃣ **Channel + Ratio Mode (Best for Optimized Performance)** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ✔ How it works: Combines both channel-based distribution and traffic weighting based on ratios. | ||
+ | ✔ Best for: Advanced deployments requiring precise traffic balancing. | ||
+ | ✔ Use Case: Large enterprise networks, SD-WAN, cloud-based applications. | ||
+ | ✔ Pros: Provides fine-grained control over traffic distribution. | ||
+ | ✔ Cons: More complex to configure and maintain. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
---- | ---- | ||
networking/wireless_topic/wi-fi_6/wi-fi_6.1723499401.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/12 16:50 by aperez